Now that grades are in from last semester, I thought I'd share some of the comments my classmates and I submitted for the class reviews. Of course, names have been changed to protect the innocent... and the guilty, too.
...
Strengths-
He is knowledgable of the subject matter. He showed up on time.
Weaknesses-
[He] is the worst professor that I have ever had, even throughout undergrad. He is very disorganized and I never really knew where he was going with the lectures. The class never knew what topic he was going to lecture on so there was no opportunity to prepare in advance.
The syllabus was of no use. Grades were arbitrarily assigned by an esoteric grading system he attempted to describe in class.
After the midterm, he did not write down any of the assignments, and refused to do so when asked. This made it difficult to understand what exactly we were supposed to accomplish. Even the Final exam, which was a take home test, was not written down. The entire class is still confused as to what we were trying to illustrate with the final.
When students would try to ask a question, he wouldn't let them finish their question. He would cut them off and proceed to answer what he thought was their question. In many instances, had he let the student finish stating his/her question then he could have saved a lot of time.
Suggestions to improve the class-
The book for the course was optional. After the confusing lectures with illegible writing on the board, I would read through the material in the book. The concepts in the book were very well laid out and easy to follow. It progressed in a very logical fashion. The professor should have utilized the book more so than his seemingly ad-hoc lectures which sometimes turned into government (referred to by [him] as the people with the guns) bashing tirades. In an academic institution like Clemson, there is no reason a professor like [him] should be allowed to continue his unprofessional pedagogy in a graduate level business course.
Would I recommend his course to a friend?
Emphatically NO. On the first night of class, he referred to the students as 'baby-killers'. He was trying to make a point that since the US military is killing women and children in Iraq and we were not protesting the war (obviously since we were sitting in his class) that we were implicitly 'baby-killers'. If this was my first course in the MBA program, I would be looking to transfer elsewhere. It was painful to endure.
...
One thing I emphasized is that he would not answer student's questions, by e-mail or in class. I also mentioned that he was often offensive, referring to the class twice as baby killer's. Yes, I went that far. I was fair, I gave him a 4 for enthusiasm about teaching (but also mentioned that he appeared lazy for not posting quiz assignments as promised.).
...
1. Syllabus was meaningless, as were grades.
2. No feedback other than number grades on the one assignment that the professor graded. These were non-negotiable. Other "quizzes" were graded by classmates.
3. Instructor never responded to emails, phone calls.
4. Assignments were not written down. In fact, he refused to write them down. As a result, assignments were unclear.
5. Grading was admittedly completely arbitrary.
6. Course lacked structure and organization.
7. Professor's handwriting on the board seemed to be purposefully hard to read.
8. Professor spoke as if we were finance PhDs. In fact, most of us hadn't taken an accounting/finance class since we first started the program. In many cases, that was years ago.
9. Grades were not given on any assingment other than the midterm as of the last day of class.
For the "would you recommend this class to a friend,":
Absolutely not. This class was painful to sit through each week.